Alla V. Drozdova, Dr. Sci. (Cultural Studies), Associate Professor, Head of Department of Advertisement and Public Relations, Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Elena V. Vlasova, Сand. Sci. (Philosophy), Associate professor, Head of Philosophy, Bioethics and Culturology, Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg, Russia.

Attitudes to “the life of the body” and its visible canons reflect the most significant challenges with their dramatic character and changeability. No longer do contemporary theoretical approaches interpret the body to mean only “a biological fact”. It is a socio-cultural phenomenon, a social construct that embodies a system of social relations and is represented by the media. Mass media translate diverse representations of corporeity. On the one hand, it speaks of openness and democracy, the possibility to take a new glance at habitual corporal stereotypes. Moreover, network communications have provided an opportunity for collective and public reflection and developing people’s versions of the corporeal norm. But, despite a polysemantic nature of visual representations, they keep on being ideologically painted and largely determined by a particular cultural tradition and the current system of cultural codes. The article aimed to identify what socio-cultural canons of corporeity, corporeal images new media reproduce. The authors exploited the program of cultural and visual studies as a methodological dominant for examining the corporeity representations. In the authors’ view, the most relevant of them is a quality technique that allows for analyzing, flexibly and reflexively, individual practices in the body representations and carrying out culturological conceptualization. It was the reason why we examined thirty utterances in the form of an essay written by the respondents aged 18–23. All of them were intensively involved in the social networks VKontakte and Instagram.

Drozdova AV, Vlasova EV. The Transformation of the Body in Today’s Media Culture. In: Perelygina EB, Zotova OYu, Drozdova AV, Tarasova LV. (eds.) Wellbeing and Security in the Face of Social Transformations: Collection of academic papers from the 10th International Symposium (Yekaterinburg, July 9–10, 2019). Yekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities; 2019. p. 272–279. Available from: doi:10.35853/LAU.WS.2019.MD07.

1. Agamben G. Nagota [Naked Life and Nudity]. Moscow: Gryundiss; 2014. 204 p. (In Russ.).
2. Baudrillard J. Obshchestvo potrebleniya. Ego mify i struktury [The society of consumption. Its myths and structures]. Moscow: Respublika; Kulturnaya revolyutsiya; 2006. 268 p. (In Russ.).
3. Bardot S. Interpretatsiya stroinogo tela [Interpretations of a slim body]. Teoriya mody = The theory of fashion. 2015;34: 81–105. (In Russ.).
4. Dubin B. Ideal’noe telo i sovremennoe obshchestvo [An ideal body and modern society]. Without boundaries: body society, culture. Official site of the festival. 21.03.2014. Available from: http://acropolis-now.org/2014/03/21/boris-dubinidealnoe-telo-i-sovremennoe-obshhestvo/ [Accessed 28.06.2019]. (In Russ.).
5. Goffman E. Predstavlenie sebya drugim v povsednevnoi zhizni [The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life]. Moscow: KANON-press-Ts; 2000. 302 p. (In Russ.).
6. Igla muzhskogo odobreniya: reklama Reebok vyzvala skandal v seti [A needle of a man’s approval: the Reebok’ ad stirred a scandal in the network]. Sostav. Website. 08.02.2019. Available from: https://sostav.ua/publication/reklamareebok-vyzvala-skandal-v-seti-80919.html [Accessed 25.06.2019]. (In Russ.).
7. Nancy J-L. Corpus. Moscow: Ad Marginem; 1999. 255 p. (In Russ.).
8. Sontag S. O fotografii [On Photography]. Moscow: Ad Marginem; 2013. 268 p. (In Russ.).
9. Foucault M. Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’. Rozhdenie tyur’my [Discipline and Panish. The death of the Prison]. Moscow: Ad Marginem; 1999. 383 p. (In Russ.).
10. Epshtein MN. Filosofiya tela [The philosophy of the body]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya; 2006. 432 p. (In Russ.).
11. Butler JP. Bodies that Matter, on the Discursive Limits of «Sex». New York, London: Routledge; 1993. 256 p.
12. Belting H. Image, Medium, Body. A New Approach to Iconology. Critical Inquiry. 2005;31(2): 302–319.
13. Douglas M. Natural Symbols: Exploration in Cosmology. New York: Routledge; 2003. 240 p.
14. Miller D. Photography in the age of Snapchat. London’s Global University: Global Social Media Impact Study. 02.02.2014. Available from: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/global-social-media/2014/02/02/photography-in-the-age-of-snapchat [Accessed 26.06.2019].
15. Nettleton S, Watson J. The body in Everyday Life: an Introduction. In: Nettleton S, Watson J. (eds.) The body in Everyday Life. London, New York: Routledge; 1998. P. 1–23.